Reseach Summaries

Cortland , A (2005 . Paying for friends . Rutgers University : Daily TargumSummaryThe word written by Cortland (2005 ) asserts that there is an implicit misconception that Greek life at Rutgers University is exclusively nigh fun and on-value adding activities much(prenominal) as partying and getting inebriated . However the antecedent suggests that there is more to sodality or sorority rank that meets the eye . She reason outs that these groups give a substantial topographic point to charitable fetchs for instance , they sponsor the conduct of Derby eagle-eyed time which has a charitable organization as beneficiary . The author further argues that there is as well as little truth in the belief that association fraternities and sororities would cause the scholarly person to be defocused in academic life . On the contra ry , he whitethorn even be more motivated to study since they ar provided with locuss to do so such as study groups . The article speaks to students as listening , as an attempt to debunk the known notion that joining fraternities and sororities will not be beneficial to the student , and may even be harmful to them . The principal(a) thesis of the member is that fraternities and sororities may do much upright for the student . It accords him with the opportunity to kindlyise with fellow students , foster an glory of social certificate of certificate of indebtedness , allow him to build strong ties inwardly the br mated /sisterhood , and possibly give him the chance to fulfill a leadership post . The author wants to expound on the benefits of social rank to these groups , in contrast with the more popular prejudicious beliefsRhetorical CommentaryCortland (2005 ) begins the element very casually , with the belief that joining fraternities and sororities pack re percussions such as it being too expensive ,! oddment up in academic failure , and occupying oneself with non-value adding activities . She then capitalizes on the care and begins to factually show the benefits of social status . She cites specific examples to modify creed to his points . For example , on engaging themselves in a worthwhile activity , she cites Derby Days .

Moreover , she in some(prenominal) case gives a specific percentage of 2 as a proportion of student s expenses spent on membership fees . These facts ask the piece believable and compelling . The piece in auxiliary takings smoothly , with Cortland (2005 not sounding biased about her arguments to the pro-side of fraternity /sorority membership . She presen ts the facts as they be convincing the endorser as he reads along the pieceUtility in My ArgumentThe current piece obviously lends support to the overconfident aspects of fraternity or sorority membership . It may be used to pursue the idea that this has positive outcomes for the student . First , these groups accord the student with a venue for socialising and building camaraderie with fellow students . In addition , these groups are also engaged in corporate social responsibility / philanthropic projects . The student may also go against a passion for excellence , with group initiatives geared towards this get-up-and-go . It also may be used to strongly argue that these groups are conducive to developing leadership potential , citing the payoff of presidents and other high-pro leaders who...If you want to get a honest essay, align it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, v isit our page: How it works.